Tuesday, November 15, 2016
PMI-Milwaukee Breakfast Discussion - Career Planning for Project Managers
Monday, October 3, 2016
SAFe Training Calendar Published!
Sunday, October 2, 2016
October 2 2016
Saturday, April 11, 2015
I have achieved my certification as CC and currently working on my Advanced Communication Series. I have started my YouTube channel and also on Pinterest .
In my upcoming post I shall share with you a schedule of the weekly posts you can expect on this blog and would love your suggestions for topics you would like me to blog on. Please share your comments and suggestions for ideas below.
Thursday, October 2, 2014
October 2nd 1869: A Glimpse Back in History
Non-violence is the greatest force at the disposal of mankind. It is mightier than the mightiest weapon of destruction devised by the ingenuity of man. - Mahatma Gandhi
![]() |
| Source:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kathiawar_Agency#mediaviewer/File:Baroda_state_1909.jpg |
-Shabana
Presented at Ozaukee Toastmasters Club #3510
October 2nd 2014
Saturday, April 12, 2014
Empathy In Business Leadership - Traits of A Great Leader
The four fundamental domains of emotional intelligence are:
1) self-awareness
2) self-management
3) social awareness, and
4) relationship building
These four domains are closely related and in order to be successful, a great leader must understand their relationship. A leader who is not aware of his or her emotions cannot manage them well due to lack of self-awareness. Their emotions are out of control and as a result relationships will suffer. In this post, I shall just focus on the relationship aspect of emotional intelligence and how empathy plays an important role in leadership. Dealing with emotions in the workplace is an skillful leadership trait and is easier said or written than practiced. Relationship management is not just about being a friendly person, it is about being genuine and authentic. For a leader, it becomes a powerful catalyst for resonance, once they are tuned in to the emotions of their teams they lead to fuel richer, more meaningful interactions.
Empathy is the ability to understand the emotional makeup of other people and it is also an artful skill in treating people according to their emotional reactions. It fuels deep connections. Business leaders who are empathetic are great active listeners. They are not just paying attention to what is being said verbally, but also tuned into the non-verbal cues from their audience. They are able to probe deeper, understand purpose, and most importantly, summarize back key points of agreement and build rapport effectively with meaning.
Hence, to be a great leader, it is important to make the connection with the people you lead- genuinely at an emotional level - in order to foster strong relationships. This in return builds rapport and becomes a powerful catalyst for resonance in bringing out the best in people. In conclusion, I am sharing this short video clip on The Power of Empathy - A RSA Short by Dr. Brennie Brown. Dr.Brown is a research storyteller & professor at the University of Houston, TX. In this clip she demonstrates the key differences between empathy and sympathy and how one drives connection while the latter drives disconnection.
Thursday, April 3, 2014
Are you breeding a cancerous middle management culture that is silently killing your organization's reputation?
Editor’s note (2026): This article was originally published in 2014, before concepts such as psychological safety and toxic middle management entered mainstream leadership discourse. I’ve chosen to leave it intact as a reflection of early thinking on organizational culture and leadership accountability.
What prompted me to write an article on this topic today? Well, it was this video on CNN.com on the French Telecom
company, Orange that was on the news recently for a recent rise in suicides
among its employees. Let me take a step back to provide a short background for
this article.
In 2012, the former Chief Executive Officer - Didier Lombard was indicted by
a court in Paris and bailed over allegations that he led a corporate culture of
bullying and harassment that resulted in the suicide of at least 30 employees.
He served in this position from 2005-2010. Critics allege that it was
some of his brutal management principles and 'bullying culture' that
contributed to these suicides. Also, in particular scrutiny was his
so-called “NExT” (New Experience in Telecommunications) program, an
effort to drive efficiency and increase customer value, resulted in a
restructure that cut more than 22,000 jobs over a short period of time. In
addition it also forced managers to change jobs every three years. This program
was soon terminated by his successor.
In 2013, once again Orange restructures its organization in an effort to simplify its
innovation structure to improve efficiency and tightens its executive
committee. Vivek Badrinath was appointed as the Deputy
Chief Executive Officer to lead the Group’s innovation, technology and customer
experience resources. Mr. Badrinath, who was 43 with a strong technical background held a few short leadership positions prior to his appointment with
Orange. Most recently this year in 2014, Vivek Badrinath, left Orange to join Accor, a hotel group.
His void was filled by appointing Mari-Noëlle Jégo-Laveissière to lead
the innovation, marketing and technologies division as reported in a press release dated March 14 by Orange.
Large corporations such as Orange, previously French Telecom,
present many challenges to their leadership. Corporate culture and
organizational identity are just two of the many important challenges
that senior leadership must pay attention to be successful in the long
run. In September 2004 French Telecom sold a part of its
shareholding and it was no longer a major shareholder as a result of the 1997
Asian Financial crisis. Hence, it became a private company after 115 years in
a post-nationalization era of the telephone system!
This organization went through a major transformation, while its top executives
maintained their focus on advancing its winning global marketplace position
further without establishing a solid transition strategy. This is evident from its executive turnover history. While executive management was focused on being a global leader in
telecommunication services, perhaps it had given birth to a silent killer - a cancerous
middle management culture that was developing operational tactics to support its
executive management's corporate strategic vision. This new sub-culture was far
different from the organization's corporate culture. Evidence of this is known
from employee survey data that was conducted during the suicide investigations.
![]() |
| Image Courtesy: BBC UK News Health |
Often middle-management is a layer between two layers of management in an organization. They are a step above a non-managerial role and a step below senior management. Some may report to a C-level executive directly, while others may just report to a non C-level executive in the organizational hierarchy. Often, this depends on the size, industry, and sector of the organization. It is imperative for C-level executives to be proactively monitoring the performance its middle-level management on a regular basis and its cultural health.
Questions such as: are our employees generally happy? What is our employee turnover ratio? What is the annual employee survey data telling us? etc. are helpful in gaining valuable insights on your organization's culture health. Instead of adding more middle-management, have you considered a shift toward abolishing middle management all together in your organization? In today's social world, rebuilding corporate reputation can be a very expensive process. Hence organizations must develop proactive measures to safeguard against any threats to its reputation.
A cancerous middle management culture can be defined as a sub-culture that threatens your organizational identity and is far different from your organization's core values and traditions. It has a negative impact on employee morale & productivity. In organizations that are not process mature, it can give birth to ad-hoc processes that help it thrive and sustain. It sometimes can ruthlessly eliminate a workforce or talent that it perceives as a threat to its existence. As it thrives in silence and spreads like cancer, it is critical for executive management to diagnose early-on and treat it swiftly as it can be detrimental to an organizational overall reputation, its identity and the workforce's well-being when left ignored.
I would like to conclude this article by asking you this thought provoking question: Are you breeding a cancerous middle management culture that is silently killing your organization's reputation? Please share your thoughts and comments !






